“Wisdom, Character and Truth – A Different Trinity”
Sermon delivered
Scriptural basis: Proverbs
8:1-4, 22-31, Romans 5:1-5, John 16:12-15
Based on the title of this sermon,
you might be thinking that I’m a coward trying to avoid preaching on the doctrine
of the Trinity. And you’d be right. The doctrine of the Trinity, as central as it
is to our faith, is nonetheless a thorny theological problem that has
confounded giant-brained scholars for centuries. The Western and Eastern Catholic churches don’t
agree on it, so much so that they named a controversy after it – the Filioque,
at least one heresy resulted from it (that would be modalism) and a lot of us
just accept it as a mystery. Several
very thick, scholarly books have been written on the Trinity, and in some
seminaries you can spend an entire semester digging deep into it. For something that is so important in
Christianity, it’s amazing how controversial it is. Frederick Buechner, the Presbyterian minister
and writer, tries to explain it this way: “The much-maligned doctrine of the
Trinity is an assertion that, appearances to the contrary notwithstanding,
there is only one God. Father, Son and
Holy Spirit mean that the mystery beyond us, the mystery among us, and the
mystery within us are all the same mystery. Thus the Trinity is a way of saying something about us and the way we
experience God. The Trinity is also a
way of saying something about God and the way he is within himself, i.e., God
does not need the Creation in order to have something to love because within
himself love happens. In other words,
the love God is is love not as a noun but as a verb. This verb is reflexive as well as
transitive. If the idea of God as both
Three and One seems far-fetched and obfuscating, look in the mirror
someday. There is (a) the interior life
known only to yourself and those you choose to communicate it to (the
Father). There is (b) the visible face
which in some measure reflects that inner life (the Son). And there is (c) the invisible power you have
in order to communicate that interior life in such a way that others do not
merely know about it, but know it in
the sense of its becoming part of who they are (the Holy Spirit). Yet what you are looking at in the mirror is
clearly and indivisibly the one and only You.” I appreciate the Reverend Buechner’s efforts, but it’s still not
completely clear to me.
The conflict between the Eastern and
Western Catholic churches boils down to where the Spirit comes from. For adherents to the Eastern Orthodox view,
the Spirit comes directly from the Father, while for Western believers the
Spirit proceeds from the Father and
the Son. The Eastern church is
attempting to make clear that there is only one God and therefore the Son and
the Spirit flow from God, the Western church is trying to emphasize that the
Son gives the Spirit to the church. No
less a luminary that Saint Augustine seems to come down on the side of the
Eastern Orthodox view when he wrote towards the end of the Fourth Century “it
is the Father only who is not of another. For the Son is born of the Father, and the Holy Spirit proceeds from the
Father. But the Father is neither born of,
nor proceeds from another. And yet this
should not occasion in human thought any idea of disparity in the supreme
Trinity. For the Son is equal to him of
whom he is born just as the Holy Spirit is equal to him from whom he proceeds.” I think this last statement is part of the
basis for explanations of the Trinity as three persons of one substance. Recently there has been rather intense debate
about the Trinity in theological circles, not so much around attempts to get a
clearer picture of how three-in-one works but around the gender-specific names
given to the three persons of the Trinity. Father, Son and Holy Spirit are seen as sexist by some theologians
today, and they are suggesting changing to Creator, Redeemer and
Sanctifier. Personally, I don’t much
care for this, if for no other reason than that it would screw up a whole bunch
of classic hymns and prayers, but at the same time I’m all for using language
that doesn’t exclude anybody from feeling a part of the church community. As Reformed Christians, we separated from the
Roman Catholic Church, the Western branch so we adhere to the view of the
Trinity that has the Son and the Spirit both proceeding from the Father. This whole controversy is a great example of
how the same Scriptures can be interpreted in different ways by intelligent,
faithful people, the end result being centuries of arguments that sap the
energy of the faith community so that less good work is done. Hmm, maybe I just preached on the doctrine of
the Trinity! But the Trinity that came
to mind as I read the Scriptures for today is quite different that Father, Son
and Holy Spirit. What jumped out at me
was Wisdom, Character and Truth.
The Hebrew Scripture for today is
from Proverbs, chapter eight. This
passage introduces us to Wisdom. Verses
twenty two through twenty five read like this: The Lord created me at the
beginning of his work, the first of his acts of long ago. Ages ago I was set up, at the first, before
the beginning of the earth. When there
were no depths I was brought forth, when there were no springs abounding with
water. Before the mountains had been
shaped, before the hills, I was brought forth. Wisdom, hokma in Hebrew and Sophia in Greek, is a feminine noun in
both languages, hence the frequent physical images of wisdom in art as a woman. Wisdom is a helper to God, working alongside
God during the creation as a master worker. King Solomon sought wisdom above riches, fame and power and was rewarded
with all four things. We prize wisdom,
admire those who display it even more than we admire raw intellect – I think we
all know some very intelligent people who don’t have a lick of common sense,
which we sometimes call folk wisdom. It’s interesting to me that we tend to equate wisdom with age and
experience. While certainly fitting,
given that Wisdom was there at the beginning working with God, the School of
Hard Knocks and the accumulation of years aren’t the only ways to gain
wisdom. Some folks are truly “wise
beyond their years.” Ask a seven year
old about what’s really important in life and I guarantee you that you’ll get a
pretty wise response.
And what of character? The passage Baxter read from Paul’s letter to
the church at
And then there’s truth. One of the bedrock principles of society is
honesty, trustworthiness. It’s what
angers us the most about politicians and business leaders, when we don’t trust
what they’re saying. The most severe
punishment I received as a child was for being dishonest, for lying. Kwame Kilpatrick was just sentenced to prison
for lying, Bill Clinton was impeached as President of the
And I think that the only way we’re
going to survive and thrive as a community and as a nation is if we enlist the
other trinity we’ve been talking about – wisdom, character and truth. By drawing on the wisdom God has given to
each of us, that we can find on the pages of our Bibles and in the works of
inspired writers, wisdom we can draw out of ourselves in prayer and in
conversation with family and friends, wisdom that we sometimes don’t believe we
possess. We should aspire to be men and
women of character, reliable and honest and upright. I’m not suggesting that you go out of your
way to find harsh trials to build your character, but I do urge you to not
avoid challenges or complain about the rotten hand you were dealt. Embrace the presence of God in your life and
let your good, strong character shine through the tough times. They’re going to come to all of us, but they
don’t ever have to break us. And of
course be truthful. Tell the truth,
demand the truth from others. It’s the
only way our society will function properly. And be Truth-ful as well, as in be filled with the Holy Spirit that is
the Spirit of Truth that proceeds from God the Father and Jesus Christ his Son.
In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.


