“Baptism by Fire”

Sermon delivered on 15 August 2010 

 Scriptural Basis: Hebrews 11:29-12:2, Luke 12:49-56

What comes to mind when you hear the phrase "baptism by fire?" For me, the first thing that pops into my head is a war movie, where the grizzled veteran leads his new recruits into battle for the first time for their "baptism by fire." In the corporate world, new executives are said to have received their "baptism by fire" when they've survived their first major crisis. In the automotive industry, the first time you go through the launch of a new vehicle and come out the other side with most of your backside intact, you've had your "baptism by fire." I think I could make a pretty good argument that my first six months here at Belleville Presbyterian have been a ministerial baptism by fire. Since I joined you, I've gone through Lent and Easter, done a funeral, officiated at a wedding, conducted five baptisms (with water), led a new members' class, dealt with two basement floods and the Strawberry Festival, been part of the inaugural Blessing of the Fleet on Belleville Lake, been assigned to a Presbytery committee, pulled a stump, and trimmed the lawn a few times. In fact, I think the only minister job I haven't done since I got here has been to lead a capital campaign to raise funds for an expanded worship space, but I suspect that's not too far off in the future. And I must tell you that I've loved every second of it, but I wouldn't have minded if it had taken a little more than six months to experience such a wide range of pastoral events. Drinking from a fire hose comes to mind...

The “baptism by fire” that Jesus speaks of in today’s gospel reading sounds pretty unpleasant, and as with a few other passages we’ve read in recent weeks doesn’t really fit with our image of Jesus as a peaceful, loving soul who wouldn’t harm a fly. Here he speaks of bringing fire to the earth, of bringing division to families instead of peace. He criticizes the crowd for being able to predict the next days’ weather based on clouds and wind yet they cannot interpret the importance of Jesus’ presence amongst them. Once again we’re left wondering what happened to our meek and mild Christ?

It seems as if Jesus is getting more and more impatient as we work our way through Luke’s gospel. We’re about at the halfway point of Luke, and Jesus has gone from being announced as one who will “guide our feet into the way of peace” in chapter one to calling people fools and talking about servants being cut in pieces for misconduct. A few chapters further on in Luke we encounter the parable of the prodigal son, but here we read of families being divided three against two and two against three. A couple of weeks ago we had James and John wanting to bring the fires of heaven down upon a Samaritan town that didn’t extend them hospitality, and here Jesus wishes the fire he came to bring to the earth were already kindled. I wonder if James and John ever complained about that, you know, how come you get to call down the fires of heaven and we don’t? What makes you so special? Jesus tells us that he’s under tremendous stress, but does that really answer the question of what happened to the Prince of Peace? What is the “baptism by fire” that Jesus infers is coming?

Before we go any further, I think it’s important to point out that there’s a big difference between fire that is used to destroy and fire that is used to cleanse and refine and form. James and John wanted to use the fires of heaven to destroy the Samaritan town. Jesus wants to use the fires of heaven to cleanse the children of Israel of their sin, to refine their understanding of the Law and the Prophets to more closely align them with the will of God, to form them into a more perfect nation. And yes, there may be some destruction along the way. It’s not unlike a forest fire, which brings tremendous devastation to the forest but also clears the way for new growth and indeed the ash from the burned trees fertilizes the tender shoots. Fire provides light that allows us to see in the darkness, provides heat that allows us to form even the hardest steel into useful tools. This is the fire which Jesus is bringing to the earth, the fire that allows us to see the kingdom of God, the fire that will change us into useful tools to be of service to all of God’s children. His impatience in wanting the fire to be already kindled is, I think the result of seeing the suffering of his people and wanting to bring it to an end. The baptism of which Jesus speaks is his coming crucifixion and resurrection, and the stress he’s under is perfectly understandable – he knows what awaits him in Jerusalem and wishes it to be over and done.

But what are we to make of the division of which Jesus speaks? That sounds almost worse than the fire! To those of us who recognize the family as the basic building block of society, those of us who grew up with images of Ozzie and Harriet and Father Knows Best defining family life, those of us who have been told by preachers that the family that prays together stays together, this talk of Jesus bringing division to households sends shivers down our spines. Once again, this isn’t the Christmas-card Jesus we’re dealing with here. But it is the Jesus who came to completely reshape society into a true community of faith, and that will require some significant reworking of the social structures that existed in the first century and also that exist in the twenty first. In the first century, much of one’s social status was determined by family ties. If your family was well-to-do, then you were held in high regard and considered to have been blessed by God. You most likely would have been afforded prominent seats in the synagogue (if you were male) and been consulted on weighty matters, both religious and political. If you weren’t so well-off, but had formed some kind of ties to a prominent family, then much of the prestige of that family would have flowed to you. If you were a working stiff, you pretty much operated on the margins of polite society in a firmly established and deeply entrenched hierarchy that was darned near impossible to break out of. No matter how hard working and successful you might have been, the odds of your moving up the social ladder were mighty slim. In the eyes of first century society, God had passed you by and all the prayers and compliance with the Law and the Prophets wasn’t going to improve your lot in life one little bit. God couldn’t be bothered talking to you, he had a seat at the head table with the “beautiful people” of the day. Doesn’t sound so very different than what we see and experience today, does it? Jesus’ advent was intended to wipe all of this away, to burn it down if you will and replace it with heaven on earth. Gone is the idea that the largest share of the family fortune goes to the eldest son, the younger sons getting to divide only a fraction of the total and the daughters be damned. All will share equally in the gifts of God to the people of God in the new order brought about by Jesus’ baptism by fire. Some will understand and embrace this new view of life, others will resist and hence will come divisions in families; father against son and son against father, mother against daughter and daughter against mother, mother-in-law against daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against mother-in-law. Jesus indeed did come to bring peace to the earth, but not peace as defined by we the people. Jesus’ peace is one of mercy, compassion and justice between God and humanity, all of humanity, not just the “beautiful people” or the eldest sons, and this peace is going to cause some tension that could well rise to the level of conflict and division, even within the nuclear family. Think about it; do you know of families in which some are committed followers of Jesus Christ and others are out hitting the strip clubs and they argue constantly about who’s doing life the right way? We know who’s doing it right, but that doesn’t settle the conflict, does it?

And why do you think Jesus calls the people who can tell what the weather will be based on observing the clouds and winds but can’t interpret the present time “hypocrites?” Aren’t hypocrites folks who say one thing but do another, who say they believe when they really don’t? Wouldn’t it be more accurate to say that these people are blind or ignorant or stubborn? Maybe not. Moral theology makes a distinction between willful ignorance and ignorance beyond our control. If we don’t fully understand what’s expected of us and we in turn don’t do things exactly right, we won’t (or shouldn’t) be punished for being a little off-target. This is ignorance that’s beyond our control. On the other hand, if we do fully understand and still do the wrong thing, we’re rightfully in for more severe consequences. This is willful ignorance, and it’s what the crowd is guilty of. They have the rich resources of the Law and the Prophets, the Torah, at their disposal that pretty clearly tells them how to conduct themselves and also clearly prophesies the coming of Jesus and what it means, yet they persist in ignoring the poor and needy amongst them, fail to offer hospitality to strangers and don’t acknowledge the lordship of Jesus. They know what they’re supposed to do and they aren’t doing it, therefore the title of hypocrite does indeed apply.

We know what we’re supposed to do, how we’re supposed to live our lives as Christians, and it ain’t always easy. The society around us seems to be increasingly hostile to what we say and do. When we were in the Smoky Mountains National Park last week, Karen, Missy and I were touched by the openness of so many people in the region with regard to their faith. At Dollywood, there was a store selling shirts and hats with religious and patriotic themes, and there wasn’t a hint of shame or reticence about it. They even asked me to sign my name in a book of military people who had visited the shop when the shopkeeper noticed my “Coast Guard Retired” cap and I was thanked for my service. We heard “God bless you” and “have a blessed day.” We experienced the best of Southern, or more precisely, Christian hospitality without a glimmer of political correctness. I know all about the restrictions in workplaces about proselytizing and how uncomfortable many of us are about sharing our faith but we have to find a way to get beyond that and let the world know who we are and what we believe and why we believe.

Don’t be a hypocrite, doing one thing but saying another just to get along or to fit in. Don’t be destroyed by the fire that Jesus brought to the earth. Be consumed by it, allow yourself to be on fire for Christ. Let the fire refine you, let it reform you.  Accept that not everybody is going to understand you, not even members of your family but don’t stop trying to get them to “get it,” and certainly don’t stop praying for them. Accept the fact that you’re different because you’re a Christian, and be bold in your difference. Presbyterians are, by temperament and training, more reserved in our demeanor. We’re not given to standing on street corners and shouting at people to believe. But that doesn’t mean that we can’t be a bold witness to the power of God to change lives. Just by living as Christ Jesus taught us, and doing so unashamedly, will send a powerful message to everyone with eyes to see and ears to hear.

 

In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.



Progress