“For the Good of All”

Sermon delivered on 4 July 2010

Scriptural Basis: Galatians 6:7-16, Luke 10:1-11, 16-20

 234 years ago today, on a hot, steamy day in Philadelphia the Founding Fathers of our nation put their signatures on the Declaration of Independence, closing their bold rejection of King George the Third of England with these words: “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.” Our nation was established, at least on paper and after 8 years of fighting we finally won our freedom from England. Some sixteen years later, the French Revolution against the tyranny of King Louis the Sixteenth went forward with the goals of “Liberté, égalité, fraternité.” Liberty, equality, fraternity (or brotherhood), which remains the national motto of France. Two great nations founded on the principles of individual freedom, equal treatment under the law, and common goals. And when necessary, shared sacrifice. In the United States, the form of government of the Presbyterian Church had great influence on the form of government adopted under the Constitution – federalism, wherein each local body (a church or a county) has its own elected governing body, in our case the Session, which is subordinate in some aspects to the Presbytery, which is in turn subordinate in some aspects to the Synod of the Covenant, which is further subordinate in some aspects to the General Assembly, which is meeting this week in Minneapolis. The parallels are of course State governments being subordinate in some aspects to the Federal government. Each level of governance is supposed to work locally and when necessary with the higher levels of governance for the good of the people they represent, who in fact put them in their positions of leadership. Central to the smooth operation of a country, or of a church, is the idea of common goals and shared sacrifice for without an underlying foundation of togetherness, communities, countries and churches are in danger of failing. As Benjamin Franklin famously said “If we don’t all hang together, then surely, we shall all hang separately.” Franklin was referring to the need for all of the Colonies to stand together as one or the Revolution would inevitably fail, because in spite of our sometimes romanticized view of the Founding Fathers standing shoulder-to-shoulder in bold defiance of the English crown, the fact of the matter is that it took a lot of back-door dealing and jawboning to get all of the colonies to sign the Declaration and even after it was signed and sent on, there wasn’t complete unanimity in the colonies for breaking with England and taking on the most powerful professional military forces in the world. Obviously when all was said and done, the Revolutionary War was won and the rest is history.

 Paul is dealing with a somewhat similar problem within the church at Galatia. The church has been established, against the deepest wishes of the Roman rulers but at least with their grudging tolerance. Members of the church are dividing up into two camps over a number of issues; the one in today’s reading being the question of circumcision for male members of the church.  On the one side there are some converted Jews who insist that the Gentile members live by all the dictates of Jewish law, including circumcision, on the other side there is Paul, the former Pharisee who is declaring that the only thing necessary for membership in the church is acceptance of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. As he writes: “For neither circumcision nor uncircumcision is anything; but a new creation is everything!” A new creation in Christ is all that matters, the rest is window dressing. If the church at Galatia can’t overcome this internal squabble and stand together, it is at risk of falling apart just as the Colonies were.

 In the gospel Jesus sends out seventy disciples to spread the Good News in the countryside, with very clear instructions to travel light, travel fast and accept whatever hospitality is offered by the townsfolk. If they welcome you, greet them with the peace of the Lord, heal the sick and tell them that the kingdom of God has come near to them. If they reject you, wipe the dust of the town from your feet in protest and say to them that the kingdom of God has come near. The message is clear; welcome the disciples and welcome God, or reject the disciples and reject God – and prepare yourselves for the consequences. Happily, the seventy return to Jesus with the news that they were universally accepted everywhere they went, and Jesus rejoices in their success but then cautions them to not let it go to their heads but to be joyful that their names are written in heaven. In other words, earthly successes are wonderful things but the real rewards await in heaven. These seventy people, in expanding the work of the original Twelve disciples had to work together to carry a common message to a disparate audience not knowing what kind of reception they would receive, relying on the protection of Divine Providence to achieve their goal – sharing the gospel with all who would listen. We know nothing about these folks, the Scriptures are silent but I think it’s safe to assume that they didn’t all look alike, wear the same clothing or think alike on all subjects. They were just people tasked with doing hard work for the common good, the common good in this case being the sharing of the good news of Jesus Christ. Jesus didn’t administer some kind of pre-evangelizing litmus test for theological purity or look to see if all was in order physically.

 Can we make the same claim? Do we welcome, truly welcome all who are willing to work for the good of all to join with us? Or do we place limitations on who can go with us to do the work of the kingdom? Do we require that others have exactly the same political philosophy as ours? That they read the same books or watch the same news broadcasts? Is there an unwritten rule that says they must have the same favorite Scripture passage and interpret it exactly as we do? That they drive the same brand of car and that it’s made in the”right” country? Would we prefer that their skin is the same color as ours and that they speak the same language at home? Are we able to set aside our preconceived notions and yes, our biases and prejudices and work together for the good of all? That is the message of both of these passages of Scripture, and indeed the message of the Declaration of Independence that we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor to advance the causes of Christianity and of freedom regardless of which political party we belong to, which sports teams we root for and what our ethnic background might be.

 Today we come to the table of our Lord to share a simple meal. There is no litmus test to take, no inspection to make sure you’re wearing the right clothes, no document check to prove that you were a perfect Christian this week. Everyone who trusts in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior is invited. Everyone who works for the good of all in the church and in the wider community around us has a place at this table. Everyone who tries their best every day to follow our Risen Lord has a place at this table. Even those of us who stumble and fall and don’t always understand what the common good looks like has a place at this table. You see, the good of all is right there in the bread and in the wine, and in your heart. God bless America, and every one of us.

 

 In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen. 



Progress